Alliance for
  
Responsible
     
Energy
        
Policy
"Supporting renewable energy
        that does not sacrifice our environment"

Industrial Wind

Industrial Concentrating
Solar Thermal
Industrial PV

Point of Use PV / Microwind
"The Better Way"
Lost Acreage

45-61 acres per MW,
plus roads, transmission
lines and staging

8-16 acres per MW,
plus roads, transmission
lines and staging

12 -15 acres per MW,
plus roads, transmission
lines and staging

None -  no new roads
or transmission.

Water Use

Minimal.

87,500 gallons per MW
annually air cooled;
2.1 million gallons per MW
annually water cooled.

Regular rinsing required -
exact figure unavailable.

None

Additional
Infrastructure
Required

Major new roads systems,
large transmission lines
(high GHG emissions)

Large transmission lines
(high GHG emissions),
natural gas lines
(fossil fuel, GHG
emissions), water
lines/wells, new roads

Large transmission lines
(high GHG emissions),
roads

None

Fossil Fuel
Consumption

Backup capacity in gas
must be built because of
inconsistencies; fossil
fuels used to ramp up
turbines to speed.

Natural gas used
in most applications.

None
None
Job Creation

Construction by large
contractors; jobs in remote
locations; modest O&M;
manufacturing usually
outsourced
Construction by large
contractors; jobs in remote
locations; modest O&M;
manufacturing usually
outsourced

Construction by large
contractors; jobs in remote
locations; modest O&M;
manufacturing may be local
Installation by local
contractors; maintenance
by local labor; benefits
remain in the community

Impact on
Property values

Steep declines for all
properties near generation
and near transmission;
destruction of viewsheds
for miles; loud roaring
sound

Steep declines for all
properties near generation
and near transmission

Steep declines for all
properties near generation
and near transmission

Steep increases - full value of
system immediately
recognized, most
jurisdictions waive property
taxes on improvement;
preserves quality of life and
views

Eminent Domain

Widespread for generation
and for transmission

Widespread for generation
and for transmission

Widespread for generation
and for transmission

None

Ratepayer
participation

Ratepayers must pay 100%
of infrastructure costs but
will not own anything;
passive energy
dependence; minimal
incentive for conservation

Ratepayers must pay 100%
of infrastructure costs but
will not own anything;
passive energy
dependence; minimal
incentive for conservation

Ratepayers must pay 100%
of infrastructure costs but
will not own anything;
passive energy
dependence; minimal
incentive for conservation

Everyone who pays for their
system owns it themselves;
active energy independence;
full participation; proven
increased conservation

Financial impact
on ratepayers

Rates will increase
benefiting solely industry;
ratepayers pay whatever
utilities charge for power.

Rates will increase
benefiting solely industry;
ratepayers pay whatever
utilities charge for power.

Rates will increase
benefiting solely industry;
ratepayers pay whatever
utilities charge for power.

Rates will increase;
feed in tariffs will compensate
ratepayer generators so
money flows to people not
just industry.

Implementation
time

Lead time 2-8 years,
construction time of
6 - 18 months.

Lead time 2-8 years,
construction time of
6 - 18 months.

Lead time 2-8 years,
construction time of
6 - 18 months.

No lead time,
immediate installation

Subscribe to our
FREE NEWSLETTER!
You Can Take Action Now!  
Send a Letter To
STOP Green Path North
Donate to AREP
Tell a Friend About AREP
The Better Way!
Click on photo to learn more
Comparison Chart
Centralized Big Wind and Big Solar vs. The Better Way
For a pdf copy of this chart and sources as published in the Sierra Club Desert Report, click here.
The Alliance for Responsible Energy Policy has produced this chart, showing a side by side comparison of the outdated centralized Big Energy model and "The Better Way" of generating and distributing renewable energy near its point of use. This chart makes the case for rooftop photovoltaics and microwind so compelling, it was published in the Sierra Club Desert Report.
Sources for the comparison chart:

Lost Acreage per MW
Industrial Wind: Source: BLM applications chart
CACA 47043 West Fry Mountains  - Florida Power & Light Energy LLC
2500 acres / 50 MW (50 acres per MW)
CACA 48658 Black Butte - Orion BP - 2442 acres / 40 - 54 MW (45-61 acres per MW)

Industrial Concentrating Solar Thermal: Source: California Energy Commission
Applicant's data responses.
Ivanpah - Bright Source - 6,720 / 400 MW (16.8 acres per MW)
Beacon - Beacon Solar, LLC - 2,012 acres / 250 MW (8 acres per MW)

Industrial PV: Source: BLM applications chart
CACA 48818 Optisolar Opal project - 14,400 acres / 1205MW (12 acres per MW)
CACA 48819 Optisolar Desert Ruby project - 15,280 acres / 1000MW (15 acres per MW)
Water Use per MW
Industrial Concentrating Solar Thermal: Source- California Energy Commission

Air Cooled - Ivanpah - Bright Source - 100a/f or 35,000,000 gallons / 400 MW (87,500 gallons per MW)

Water cooled - Beacon - 1500 a/f or 525,000,000 gallons / 250 MW (2.1 million gallons per MW)
CHUCHWALLA VALLEY:
A desert paradise
under assault! >>>
Alliance for Responsible Energy Policy     P.O. Box 396   Joshua Tree, CA   92252     AREP@protectourlands.com
Website designed by I Candy Website and Graphic Design